Post by dragondarknessflame7 on Apr 6, 2019 21:08:34 GMT -5
This is random as hell, but I started reminiscing about the past and remembered something that took place in one of the tournaments I played in. Nothing urgent, or relavent anymore really just was curious. My situation involved:
I, at the time, was competing in a local Yu Yu Hakusho card tournament. I had Raizen up against whoever they had up, can't remember. Anyways, they played this technique attack, and then beefed the shit out of it to deal a double hit against my fighter (two card turn) to Raizen. Like a straight bone head, I didn't read all of my Raizen fighter's effects, and what not. When he went to deal damage with the same attack for some reason I first picked up Raizen to see what it said on the bottom of the card. Doh! It stated any attack attempting to deal damage to Raizen coming from a technique is reduced to zero. The guy I was competing against, and I asked an official if my oversight meant that regardless of my fighter's ability, did the fact that I had already applied the two hit damage retract the option for me to negate the first attack that should have been negated to begin with? They ruled in his favor which costed me the match. I'm not saying I don't agree with there choice cause I should have known before hand, but wanted to know if that's the same ruling I would have received anywhere else, or would the same be applied now?
I, at the time, was competing in a local Yu Yu Hakusho card tournament. I had Raizen up against whoever they had up, can't remember. Anyways, they played this technique attack, and then beefed the shit out of it to deal a double hit against my fighter (two card turn) to Raizen. Like a straight bone head, I didn't read all of my Raizen fighter's effects, and what not. When he went to deal damage with the same attack for some reason I first picked up Raizen to see what it said on the bottom of the card. Doh! It stated any attack attempting to deal damage to Raizen coming from a technique is reduced to zero. The guy I was competing against, and I asked an official if my oversight meant that regardless of my fighter's ability, did the fact that I had already applied the two hit damage retract the option for me to negate the first attack that should have been negated to begin with? They ruled in his favor which costed me the match. I'm not saying I don't agree with there choice cause I should have known before hand, but wanted to know if that's the same ruling I would have received anywhere else, or would the same be applied now?
